Sony SLT-A77 Advert

Were you at the FNB Stadium this past weekend for the big match? Even if you were not check out http://player23.co.za/fancam.php?track=fancam

The Vodacom Fan Cam Image is a 360 degree HD image of the entire stadium and all the people in it. The image takes roughly 4 minutes to capture the stadium in its entirety with 800,000 individual images being taken, the 800,000 images will then be “stitched together” to create a seamless image of the entire stadium and all the people inside it. The images were captured by Virtual Africa the company which also did the 360 degree views of all the World Cup stadiums. For more information on how they capture these great images and for more images head over to http://virtualafrica.co.za/




Leica have unveiled a new Compact in the form of the V-LUX20. Like most compact ‘consumer’ Leica cameras this is remarkably similar to a Panasonic – the TZ10/ZS7 to be precise – with a bigger price tag and in this case, one or two inferior features, the main one being that of the 720p HD video being in Motion JPEG format rather than AVCHD. One great feature insluded in this camera is GPS for Geotagging of photographs.

The summary of features:

  • 12.1 MP sensor
  • 12x Optical zoom (giving the equivilent of 25-300mm)
  • 3″ LCD at 460K resolution

You can view more on the camera at Leica’s site.




The leader in speed and image qualityLeaf_aptus_II_back_WHITE small
The Leaf Aptus-II series of digital backs offers professional photographers the speed, image quality and flexibility to push their work beyond expectations.

The all new Leaf Aptus-II series includes a top of the line offering with the only True Wide Frame sensor. With the Leaf Aptus-II 10, you can capture what was previously impossible, with a revolutionary, digital sensor that achieves True Wide Frame shooting. This 56mm x 36mm sensor offers a higher resolution (56MP) and allows for fullwidth imaging.


Continue reading »




The new Hasselblad CFV-39 digital back, custom built to match the design and functionality of Hasselblad V cameras, turns every V camera into an easy-to-use digital workhorse.

The 39-megapixel back, with a sensor twice the size of premier DSLRs, features two capture modes and a new digital lens correction technology for Carl Zeiss lenses, powered by Mac- and Windows-compatible Phocus image processing software.

“Quickly and easily, the Hasselblad CFV-39 can transform a V System film camera into a high-performance digital camera,” says product manager Peter Stig. “Just snap on a charged battery, insert a CF card, add the back, and you’re ready to shoot.”

Among the CFV-39’s features and capabilities:
~ The Hasselblad Natural Color Solution offers a generic profile that delivers true colors right out of the box.
~ All V System cameras operate cable-free. The 202 FA, 203 FE, and 205 FCC are fully supported. Other 200 and 2000 series models can be used with C-type lenses only.
~ All F and FE lenses work seamlessly with the CFV-39 using 202FA, 203FE and 205TCC/FCC (camera requires slight modification).
~ There are two selectable image formats: square (29 megapixel, 5412×5412) and rectangular (39 megapixel, 5412×7212 pixels).
~ The sensor is 100 percent larger than a full-frame 35mm DSLR sensor.
~ Image storage options include using a CF card for untethered operation or computer hard drive for tethered operation.
~ A Hasselblad raw file format, 3F RAW (3FR), ensure that images captured with Hasselblad digital products are quickly, effectively, and safely stored on the available media.
~ The 3FR files can be opened directly in Adobe Photoshop CS4, in Aperture on Mac OS-X, and converted directly into Adobe’s DNG (Digital NeGative).
~ Hasselblad image files carry a full set of metadata, including capture conditions, keywords and copyright, facilitating image asset management solutions.
~ Fits traditional view cameras: with the V camera interface plate for mechanical attachment and the flash sync connection to trigger digital capture.
~ Capture rate of 1.4 sec per capture with 39 captures per minute.
~ ISO speeds range from 50 to 800.
~ H camera owners can gain full access to V lens DAC correction by using the CF lens adapter.

“The Hasselblad CFV-39 brings an ultra-high level of integration, flexibility, and image quality to the professional photographer who needs the best for mobile and studio shooting,” says Peter Stig.

Text by Alice B. Miller




Thursday was the annual late night trading in Parkhurst – happening again next week, 29Nov’07 for those interested – and being in the area I decided to pop in to The Cow Artworks to see what was on. It was great to see some wonderful black and white prints on the walls and appreciate the talents of other photographers, more particularly that of local people who are doing so well here and abroad.

I had time to chat for just a few minutes to Athol Rheeder who is currently exhibiting his work from his book ‘Unto London’ there at the gallery. What fascinated me about our chat was his passion for film and the amazing printing of Silvertone International in Parktown. His voice echoed that of professional photographers from around the world in recent surveys conducted by Kodak this year. Perhaps I can share their findings with you briefly here.

The Europe Survey conducted around June/July’07 found that of the nearly 3000 photographers who participated

* 67% intended to continue using film
* 55% preferred the results of film over digital
* 19% admitted to choosing a film camera for more than 60% of their work
* 80% of photographers participating in the survey shoot black & white with 45% of those preferring film.

In the US survey conducted Aug/Sep’07 more than 9000 professional photographers responded, with the following being the results of that survey.

* 75% of participating photographers said they will continue to use film even while “embracing digital”
* 68% prefer the results of film to digital
* 48% felt film was superior in capturing information on medium and large formats
* 48% use film to create a “traditional photographic look”
* 45% prefer film for capturing shadow and highlight detail
* 42% prefer film’s wide exposure latitude
* 38% appreciated film’s archival storage
* 90% of the surveyed photographers shoot black & white with 47% saying the medium has a certain look or feel
* 57% of black & white photographers choose film to achieve the look and feel they find in black & white images

In both surveys some of the reasons given by the photographers for their preference of film over digital were

* Ability to capture detail
* the “traditional” look
* shadow detail
* Less time behind the PC and more behind the lens.

It is not surprising that Kodak has reaffirmed its dedication to the medium of film as it seeks to grow its share of both the traditional and digital markets.

I found this rather fascinating, and felt somewhat satisfied that I was not all alone on this side of the fence. Don’t get me wrong, I own a few digitals and contrary to what some have said about spending less time behind the lens because of editing images, I find that I am shooting more than I ever could afford on film, but that doesn’t mean I am sold 100%. My collection of ‘paper weight’ film bodies has grown far beyond what I had expected it would.

I have a few gripes with digital starting with the purchase of my first digital SLR with a second hand lens that was considered to be extremely sharp for the system I had bought into on film. I was shocked when I sat down to look at my images and found that they lacked the crispness I had attained some years before when I had previously used this lens. I have subsequently found many explanations for this, but it was a major blow to my confident decision to go digital. Suddenly I found that all the knowledge I had gained from previous experiments with some 100 or so lenses I had tested in the past did not hold true on digital. I had to start from scratch.

It took a few weeks to resolve the lens issue. Once this was done my enthusiasm gained momentum and there was hardly a day that I did not pick up my new camera. I quickly found the benefits of experimenting without fear of cost. This throwing of caution to the wind meant I was shooting some 500 images within the first few weeks and getting the odd exceptional image from my “never tried before” attempts to record things in a different way to what I did in the past. Digital photography was GREAT!

Then something began to happen – I am not a big user of photo editing software, mainly for two reasons. First I don’t get hugely excited by it. It’s not that I don’t believe in it, I just don’t get the butterflies in my stomach or the magical childlike feeling that I felt in the darkroom – though I know many who do feel such emotions as they eagerly open their images and adjust the levels, brightness, contrast etc. The second reason I don’t Photoshop much is the feeling I have of limited knowledge in the program, and though I want to learn more, the limited time restraints mean that the more time I’m behind the PC, the less time I’m behind the lens. Yet the more I shot, the more I find myself glaring into the screen of my PC, a cycle that seems to never stop.

Remember the days when a good image in a roll of 36 exposures was a moment where you almost felt a tear come to your eyes? Today one feels a tear because its usually one shot out of 50 or 100. I have very few images up on my walls at home – sad when you consider that with digital I am shooting more than ever before – and those few photographs are my pride and joy, but none of them are printed from digital, and this is my final gripe. I work with digital printing daily, and perhaps I am going blind (all the long night in front of my screen) but I find there is “punch” missing in the prints I do today. I recently read an article quoting a professional photographer as stating that in some small why, the emulsion of film and paper is 3 dimensional due to the nature of its make up, its density. Maybe digital appears flat simply because it is just that, flat capture. Whatever the reason, for me this is my greatest gripe, or at least par with detail and sharpness from scratch because in my world an image is not an image till it is printed and usually the bigger, the better I feel. It is in the print that the work is done and on digital I sit with more unprinted than I ever had on film.

In conclusion, will I ever leave film? I doubt I will completely, in fact right now my wife sighs each time she passes the enlarger I just enquired for our one room apartment that will soon have a part-time lavatory/darkroom.


Afrigator